Better Likes vs Emoji Reactions in Twitter

Both extensions add a reaction layer where the platform doesn't have one. The difference is in the details: who can see the reactions, who maintains the code, and what the extension discloses about your data.

TL;DR

Per its Chrome Web Store card, Emoji Reactions in Twitter is a Chrome-only extension whose reactions are "visible only to other users of the same extension". The store card also discloses handling of authentication information. Its last release dated on the public store card is March 2022 — over four years before today.

Better Likes is GPL-3, runs on Chrome / Firefox / Edge, supports a growing list of social, dev, and shopping sites, never asks for your Twitter or any other platform's credentials, and uses a one-time email verification to make sure each reaction count reflects a verified person rather than an anonymous install.

At a glance

Better Likes Emoji Reactions in Twitter
Sites covered Facebook, GitHub, Amazon — and growing Twitter / X only
Reactions visible to All Better Likes users — aggregated public count Only other users of the same extension
Source code Public on GitHub, GPL-3 Closed source. No public repository linked from the store card.
Privacy disclosure Salted email hash, no raw email persisted, salted IP hash for rate-limit (policy) Chrome Web Store card discloses handling of authentication information.
Identity model One verified email = one account Not publicly documented
Last public release Continuously released from GitHub 2022-03-05 per the Chrome Web Store card
Browsers Chrome, Firefox, Edge Chrome only

Where Better Likes is the better choice

1. Multi-platform from day one

Emoji Reactions in Twitter operates only on Twitter. If you also want reactions on a Facebook post you saw earlier, a GitHub repo, or an Amazon product, this extension simply has nothing for you. Better Likes covers all three, with the same picker, same counts, and same history view across all of them. Adding new sites (Reddit, Stack Overflow, Hacker News, an internal company portal via the selectors config) is a small adapter, not a fork.

2. You can read the code

Emoji Reactions in Twitter is closed source — the Chrome Web Store card doesn't link a public repository. That's not a crime, but it does mean you trust the binary you install without an independent way to verify what it does.

Better Likes is GPL-3. The extension, the Cloudflare Worker, the database schema, the landing page — every line is on GitHub. Security researchers can audit it; users can compile their own build; nobody has to take our word for anything.

3. Verified counts, not visible-to-same-extension counts

Emoji Reactions in Twitter's reactions are only visible to other users of the same extension. That's a design choice with real consequences: a viral tweet's "real" reaction count is hidden behind extension adoption, and the same person on three browsers will count three times.

Better Likes's counts are aggregated globally and gated on one-time email verification. The count under a Facebook post in Better Likes means "this many verified Better Likes users reacted with this emoji" — not "this many people who happened to install the same browser plugin you did".

4. Actively maintained

Twitter/X has been through several major UI overhauls since March 2022 — including a brand change. Any DOM-touching extension that hasn't been updated since then is one Twitter release away from breaking. Better Likes's selectors config is specifically designed to be hot-patchable from the server without re-shipping, so when a target site changes markup we don't need a new store release.

Which one should you pick?

Pick Better Likes if you want a multi-site, open-source, actively-maintained reaction extension with a verified-accounts identity model and clearly documented privacy posture.

We genuinely couldn't find a case where Emoji Reactions in Twitter would be the better choice for a user today.

Sources