Better Likes vs AllReacts for Facebook Stories

AllReacts is a tidy little MIT-licensed tool: it lets you send any emoji as a reaction on a Facebook Story by calling Facebook's own GraphQL endpoint. Better Likes is a different shape entirely — a community-driven emoji reaction layer, everywhere on the web.

TL;DR

AllReacts is honest about how it works: it forges Facebook's own GraphQL story-reaction request, complete with headers like x-fb-lsd and x-asbd-id, so a custom emoji you pick is delivered as if Facebook supported it natively. That's clever — and also extremely fragile, because Facebook changes those parameters often. The project's own v2.0.1 release notes specifically call out fixing 429 rate-limit errors caused by Facebook tweaking its API.

Better Likes doesn't ride on top of Facebook's reaction API. It runs an independent community counter so that you can leave a reaction where the platform offers none — like under a GitHub repo or an Amazon product — and so that the count of, say, 🔥 under a Facebook post means "X verified Better Likes users reacted with 🔥", not "Facebook says X people did".

At a glance

Better Likes AllReacts for Facebook Stories
Primary job Community reaction counts under public content Inject custom emoji into a Facebook Story via Facebook's own GraphQL
Sites covered Facebook, GitHub, Amazon — and growing Facebook Stories only
Reactions stored where? On the Better Likes server, open-source worker On Facebook, as a real Story reaction visible to the recipient
Depends on the target platform's private API? No — we observe DOM only; selectors are hot-patchable Yes — relies on Facebook's GraphQL story-reaction call and matching headers. Per v2.0.1, those headers had to be changed to stop 429 errors.
Login model One-time email verification → 30-day session Uses your existing Facebook login session
License GPL-3 MIT
Public reach Brand-new ~22 Chrome users, ~12 Firefox users (store cards)

Where Better Likes is the better choice

1. You want reactions on more than just Stories

AllReacts is, by design, Stories-only. Posts, comments, reels, messages, GitHub repos, Amazon products — all out of scope. If your goal is to leave an emoji where the platform doesn't offer one, Better Likes's surface is much wider.

2. You want reactions that don't break the next time Facebook ships

Forging GraphQL calls is a smart hack, but it's an implementation built on private internals. The AllReacts changelog already shows what that costs: when Facebook flipped headers, users started seeing instant 429 rate-limit errors until x-fb-lsd and x-asbd-id were added back. That's normal — but it's the kind of fragility Better Likes is specifically designed to avoid.

Better Likes never calls a target site's private API. The extension reads the DOM, finds public anchors (a post, a star button, a buy-box), and renders a separate picker. If Facebook tweaks markup, we patch a selector entry on our server and every user picks it up on next page load. No reinstall, no 429s.

3. The reactions count, and the count means something

AllReacts doesn't aggregate counts at all — each reaction goes into the recipient's Story inbox, that's where it lives. Better Likes is the opposite: every reaction contributes to a public count visible to other Better Likes users. For that count to mean something we tie each vote to a verified email, so it isn't just a sum over anonymous installs.

4. They aren't replacements for each other — use both if you want both

AllReacts is the right tool if your friend's Story deserves a 🦖 reaction and Facebook only offers six emoji. It does that job well within the constraints of Facebook's API. Better Likes is the right tool if you want reactions on the rest of your browsing day. They don't fight; they just don't overlap.

Which one should you pick?

Pick AllReacts if your single use case is sending non-default emoji as native Facebook Story reactions, and you're comfortable updating when Facebook shifts its API.

Pick Better Likes if you want a maintained, cross-site reaction layer with verified accounts behind the counts.

Sources